processconvert
Stress

kgf/cm²todyn/cm²

Convert kilograms-force per square centimetre (stress) (kgf/cm²) to dynes per square centimetre (stress) (dyn/cm²).

Factor1 kgf/cm² = 980665 dyn/cm²

Converter

kgf/cm²

Accepts numbers or expressions, e.g. 150 + 14.7

Result
980665dyn/cm²

Rendered to 6 significant figures.

Formula

Formula
dyn/cm² = kgf/cm² × 980665

Multiply any value in kilograms-force per square centimetre (stress) by 980665 to obtain the value in dynes per square centimetre (stress).

Worked example

Convert 1 kgf/cm² to dyn/cm².

  1. 01Start with 1 kgf/cm².
  2. 02Multiply by the conversion factor: 1 × 980665 = 980665 dyn/cm².
Result1 kgf/cm² = 980665 dyn/cm²

Conversion table

kgf/cm²dyn/cm²
19.8067e+5
21.9613e+6
54.9033e+6
109.8067e+6
201.9613e+7
504.9033e+7
1009.8067e+7
2001.9613e+8
5004.9033e+8
10009.8067e+8

Reference values rounded to 5 significant figures for display.

FAQ

What is the conversion factor from kgf/cm² to dyn/cm²?
1 kgf/cm² equals 980665 dyn/cm². To convert, multiply the value in kilograms-force per square centimetre (stress) by 980665.
How do I convert 1 kgf/cm² to dyn/cm²?
1 kgf/cm² = 980665 dyn/cm². For any value, multiply by 980665.
How do I convert dyn/cm² back to kgf/cm²?
Divide by the same factor — or equivalently, multiply by 1.019716e-6. So 1 dyn/cm² = 1.01972e-6 kgf/cm².
When would I need to convert kilogram-force per square centimetre (stress) to dyne per square centimetre (stress)?
Stress conversions between kgf/cm² and dyn/cm² are routine in mechanics-of-materials work: yield, ultimate and allowable-stress specification, Young's-modulus tables and structural-design code calculations. MPa and N/mm² dominate ISO and European datasheets, psi and ksi dominate US structural codes, and kgf/cm² and kgf/mm² appear in legacy JIS and heavy-engineering documentation. Stress is the same physical dimension as pressure but a different engineering quantity — this category is mechanics-of-materials, not process pressure.
Is the conversion exact?
The factor shown is precise to at least 7 significant figures. For most process-engineering work this is far better than instrument accuracy. For metrology or trade applications, refer to the relevant national standard (NIST, BIPM, ISO 80000).

Related conversions