processconvert
Stress

dyn/cm²tokgf/cm²

Convert dynes per square centimetre (stress) (dyn/cm²) to kilograms-force per square centimetre (stress) (kgf/cm²).

Factor1 dyn/cm² = 1.019716e-6 kgf/cm²

Converter

dyn/cm²

Accepts numbers or expressions, e.g. 150 + 14.7

Result
1.01972kgf/cm²

Rendered to 6 significant figures.

Formula

Formula
kgf/cm² = dyn/cm² × 1.019716e-6

Multiply any value in dynes per square centimetre (stress) by 1.019716e-6 to obtain the value in kilograms-force per square centimetre (stress).

Worked example

Convert 1.00000e+6 dyn/cm² to kgf/cm².

  1. 01Start with 1.00000e+6 dyn/cm².
  2. 02Multiply by the conversion factor: 1.00000e+6 × 1.019716e-6 = 1.01972 kgf/cm².
Result1.00000e+6 dyn/cm² = 1.01972 kgf/cm²

Conversion table

dyn/cm²kgf/cm²
11.0197e-6
22.0394e-6
55.0986e-6
101.0197e-5
202.0394e-5
505.0986e-5
1000.00010197
2000.00020394
5000.00050986
10000.0010197

Reference values rounded to 5 significant figures for display.

FAQ

What is the conversion factor from dyn/cm² to kgf/cm²?
1 dyn/cm² equals 1.019716e-6 kgf/cm². To convert, multiply the value in dynes per square centimetre (stress) by 1.019716e-6.
How do I convert 1 dyn/cm² to kgf/cm²?
1 dyn/cm² = 1.01972e-6 kgf/cm². For any value, multiply by 1.019716e-6.
How do I convert kgf/cm² back to dyn/cm²?
Divide by the same factor — or equivalently, multiply by 980665. So 1 kgf/cm² = 980665 dyn/cm².
When would I need to convert dyne per square centimetre (stress) to kilogram-force per square centimetre (stress)?
Stress conversions between dyn/cm² and kgf/cm² are routine in mechanics-of-materials work: yield, ultimate and allowable-stress specification, Young's-modulus tables and structural-design code calculations. MPa and N/mm² dominate ISO and European datasheets, psi and ksi dominate US structural codes, and kgf/cm² and kgf/mm² appear in legacy JIS and heavy-engineering documentation. Stress is the same physical dimension as pressure but a different engineering quantity — this category is mechanics-of-materials, not process pressure.
Is the conversion exact?
The factor shown is precise to at least 7 significant figures. For most process-engineering work this is far better than instrument accuracy. For metrology or trade applications, refer to the relevant national standard (NIST, BIPM, ISO 80000).

Related conversions