Frequency
cycles/hrtocycles/min
Convert cycles per hour (cycles/hr) to cycles per minute (cycles/min).
Factor1 cycles/hr = 0.01666667 cycles/min
Converter
cycles/hr
Accepts numbers or expressions, e.g. 150 + 14.7
Result
cycles/min
Rendered to 6 significant figures.
Formula
Formula
cycles/min = cycles/hr × 0.01666667
Multiply any value in cycles per hour by 0.01666667 to obtain the value in cycles per minute.
Worked example
Convert 60 cycles/hr to cycles/min.
- 01Start with 60 cycles/hr.
- 02Multiply by the conversion factor: 60 × 0.01666667 = 1 cycles/min.
Result60 cycles/hr = 1 cycles/min
Conversion table
| cycles/hr | cycles/min |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0.016667 |
| 2 | 0.033333 |
| 5 | 0.083333 |
| 10 | 0.16667 |
| 20 | 0.33333 |
| 50 | 0.83333 |
| 100 | 1.6667 |
| 200 | 3.3333 |
| 500 | 8.3333 |
| 1000 | 16.667 |
Reference values rounded to 5 significant figures for display.
FAQ
What is the conversion factor from cycles/hr to cycles/min?
1 cycles/hr equals 0.01666667 cycles/min. To convert, multiply the value in cycles per hour by 0.01666667.
How do I convert 1 cycles/hr to cycles/min?
1 cycles/hr = 0.0166667 cycles/min. For any value, multiply by 0.01666667.
How do I convert cycles/min back to cycles/hr?
Divide by the same factor — or equivalently, multiply by 60. So 1 cycles/min = 60 cycles/hr.
When would I need to convert cycle per hour to cycle per minute?
Frequency conversions between cycles/hr and cycles/min are needed in signal and RF engineering, motor and turbomachinery rotational-speed work, vibration and pulse-rate analysis, and control-loop sample-rate specification. Hz dominates electronics and instrumentation; kHz, MHz and GHz cover audio through microwave; rpm and rps dominate mechanical rotational equipment; cycles per minute, second and hour cover slow industrial cyclic processes. Angular frequency (rad/s) and time-period (Hz ↔ seconds) conversions are NOT included — they require either a 2π factor or a reciprocal relationship.
Is the conversion exact?
The factor shown is precise to at least 7 significant figures. For most process-engineering work this is far better than instrument accuracy. For metrology or trade applications, refer to the relevant national standard (NIST, BIPM, ISO 80000).