▸ processconvert
Volumetric Flux

m³/m²/daytom³/m²/s

Convert cubic metres per square metre per day (m³/m²/day) to cubic metres per square metre per second (m³/m²/s).

Factor1 m³/m²/day = 1.157407e-5 m³/m²/s

Converter

m³/m²/day

Accepts numbers or expressions, e.g. 150 + 14.7

Result
1m³/m²/s

Rendered to 6 significant figures.

Formula

Formula
m³/m²/s = m³/m²/day × 1.157407e-5

Multiply any value in cubic metres per square metre per day by 1.157407e-5 to obtain the value in cubic metres per square metre per second.

Worked example

Convert 86400 m³/m²/day to m³/m²/s.

  1. 01Start with 86400 m³/m²/day.
  2. 02Multiply by the conversion factor: 86400 × 1.157407e-5 = 1 m³/m²/s.
Result86400 m³/m²/day = 1 m³/m²/s

Conversion table

m³/m²/daym³/m²/s
11.1574e-5
22.3148e-5
55.787e-5
100.00011574
200.00023148
500.0005787
1000.0011574
2000.0023148
5000.005787
10000.011574

Reference values rounded to 5 significant figures for display.

FAQ

What is the conversion factor from m³/m²/day to m³/m²/s?
1 m³/m²/day equals 1.157407e-5 m³/m²/s. To convert, multiply the value in cubic metres per square metre per day by 1.157407e-5.
How do I convert 1 m³/m²/day to m³/m²/s?
1 m³/m²/day = 1.15741e-5 m³/m²/s. For any value, multiply by 1.157407e-5.
How do I convert m³/m²/s back to m³/m²/day?
Divide by the same factor — or equivalently, multiply by 86400. So 1 m³/m²/s = 86400 m³/m²/day.
When would I need to convert cubic metre per square metre per day to cubic metre per square metre per second?
Volumetric-flux conversions between m³/m²/day and m³/m²/s are routine in membrane filtration (RO, UF, MF, NF permeate flux), hydraulic loading specification, water-treatment design, hydrometallurgy and packed-bed column loading, and environmental engineering. LMH (L/m²/h) and gfd (gal/ft²/day) dominate membrane datasheets; m³/m²/h and m³/m²/day cover SI engineering ladders; m/day and cm/s appear as superficial velocity in hydromet and packed-bed work. Volumetric flux is the same physical quantity as superficial velocity (m³/m²/s ≡ m/s) but is kept distinct from the velocity and flow categories because the engineering intent is volumetric throughput per unit area, not bulk motion or total throughput.
Is the conversion exact?
The factor shown is precise to at least 7 significant figures. For most process-engineering work this is far better than instrument accuracy. For metrology or trade applications, refer to the relevant national standard (NIST, BIPM, ISO 80000).

Related conversions