processconvert
Volumetric Flux

gpm/ft²toin/min

Convert US gallons per minute per square foot (gpm/ft²) to inches per minute (volumetric flux) (in/min).

Factor1 gpm/ft² = 1.604126 in/min

Converter

gpm/ft²

Accepts numbers or expressions, e.g. 150 + 14.7

Result
16.0413in/min

Rendered to 6 significant figures.

Formula

Formula
in/min = gpm/ft² × 1.604126

Multiply any value in US gallons per minute per square foot by 1.604126 to obtain the value in inches per minute (volumetric flux).

Worked example

Convert 10 gpm/ft² to in/min.

  1. 01Start with 10 gpm/ft².
  2. 02Multiply by the conversion factor: 10 × 1.604126 = 16.0413 in/min.
Result10 gpm/ft² = 16.0413 in/min

Conversion table

gpm/ft²in/min
11.6041
23.2083
58.0206
1016.041
2032.083
5080.206
100160.41
200320.83
500802.06
10001604.1

Reference values rounded to 5 significant figures for display.

FAQ

What is the conversion factor from gpm/ft² to in/min?
1 gpm/ft² equals 1.604126 in/min. To convert, multiply the value in US gallons per minute per square foot by 1.604126.
How do I convert 1 gpm/ft² to in/min?
1 gpm/ft² = 1.60413 in/min. For any value, multiply by 1.604126.
How do I convert in/min back to gpm/ft²?
Divide by the same factor — or equivalently, multiply by 0.6233924. So 1 in/min = 0.623392 gpm/ft².
When would I need to convert US gallon per minute per square foot to inch per minute (volumetric flux)?
Volumetric-flux conversions between gpm/ft² and in/min are routine in membrane filtration (RO, UF, MF, NF permeate flux), hydraulic loading specification, water-treatment design, hydrometallurgy and packed-bed column loading, and environmental engineering. LMH (L/m²/h) and gfd (gal/ft²/day) dominate membrane datasheets; m³/m²/h and m³/m²/day cover SI engineering ladders; m/day and cm/s appear as superficial velocity in hydromet and packed-bed work. Volumetric flux is the same physical quantity as superficial velocity (m³/m²/s ≡ m/s) but is kept distinct from the velocity and flow categories because the engineering intent is volumetric throughput per unit area, not bulk motion or total throughput.
Is the conversion exact?
The factor shown is precise to at least 7 significant figures. For most process-engineering work this is far better than instrument accuracy. For metrology or trade applications, refer to the relevant national standard (NIST, BIPM, ISO 80000).

Related conversions