processconvert
Stress

kgf/cm²toGPa

Convert kilograms-force per square centimetre (stress) (kgf/cm²) to gigapascals (stress) (GPa).

Factor1 kgf/cm² = 9.80665e-5 GPa

Converter

kgf/cm²

Accepts numbers or expressions, e.g. 150 + 14.7

Result
0.980665GPa

Rendered to 6 significant figures.

Formula

Formula
GPa = kgf/cm² × 9.80665e-5

Multiply any value in kilograms-force per square centimetre (stress) by 9.80665e-5 to obtain the value in gigapascals (stress).

Worked example

Convert 10000 kgf/cm² to GPa.

  1. 01Start with 10000 kgf/cm².
  2. 02Multiply by the conversion factor: 10000 × 9.80665e-5 = 0.980665 GPa.
Result10000 kgf/cm² = 0.980665 GPa

Conversion table

kgf/cm²GPa
19.8067e-5
20.00019613
50.00049033
100.00098066
200.0019613
500.0049033
1000.0098067
2000.019613
5000.049033
10000.098067

Reference values rounded to 5 significant figures for display.

FAQ

What is the conversion factor from kgf/cm² to GPa?
1 kgf/cm² equals 9.80665e-5 GPa. To convert, multiply the value in kilograms-force per square centimetre (stress) by 9.80665e-5.
How do I convert 1 kgf/cm² to GPa?
1 kgf/cm² = 9.80665e-5 GPa. For any value, multiply by 9.80665e-5.
How do I convert GPa back to kgf/cm²?
Divide by the same factor — or equivalently, multiply by 10197.16. So 1 GPa = 10197.2 kgf/cm².
When would I need to convert kilogram-force per square centimetre (stress) to gigapascal (stress)?
Stress conversions between kgf/cm² and GPa are routine in mechanics-of-materials work: yield, ultimate and allowable-stress specification, Young's-modulus tables and structural-design code calculations. MPa and N/mm² dominate ISO and European datasheets, psi and ksi dominate US structural codes, and kgf/cm² and kgf/mm² appear in legacy JIS and heavy-engineering documentation. Stress is the same physical dimension as pressure but a different engineering quantity — this category is mechanics-of-materials, not process pressure.
Is the conversion exact?
The factor shown is precise to at least 7 significant figures. For most process-engineering work this is far better than instrument accuracy. For metrology or trade applications, refer to the relevant national standard (NIST, BIPM, ISO 80000).

Related conversions