processconvert
Hydrometallurgy

Metallurgical Recovery Formulas Explained

The concept anchor for metallurgical recovery accounting — recovery, mass yield (mass pull), ratio of concentration, enrichment ratio, and the two-product and three-product formulas, all derived from mass balance on measured assays. Carries the accounting-vs-prediction boundary: these account for measured streams; they do not predict recovery or plant performance.

TypeEngineering guide — concept explainer

Definition

Metallurgical recovery formulas are the mass-balance relationships that turn measured plant assays into the accounting metrics of a concentrator: recovery, mass yield (mass pull), ratio of concentration, and enrichment ratio. Their defining feature is that they reconcile grades you have already measured — the feed, concentrate, and tailings assays of a metal — rather than predicting how a circuit will behave. For a single-concentrate (two-product) circuit, the whole family follows from one mass balance on a feed basis F = 1: the mass yield to concentrate is Y = (f − t)/(c − t); the metal recovery is R = Y·(c/f); the ratio of concentration is K = 1/Y = (c − t)/(f − t); and the enrichment ratio is simply c/f. A two-concentrate circuit uses the three-product formula, which solves a two-metal balance across four streams for the mass fraction of feed reporting to each concentrate. Every one of these is an accounting identity — an exact consequence of conservation of mass and metal across measured streams.

Why it matters

The single sharpest distinction in this whole topic is accounting versus prediction. These formulas account for what a circuit did over a sampled period; they do not forecast what recovery it will achieve, model flotation or leaching, optimise a plant, or replace testwork. That matters because the same word — 'recovery' — is used for two very different things: the metallurgical recovery you compute from this period's assays (accounting) and the recovery a metallurgist hopes a circuit will reach (prediction). The formulas here only do the first. Getting the accounting right matters because recovery and yield are routinely confused (a high-grade, low-mass-pull concentrate can still carry most of the metal), because the ratio of concentration and enrichment ratio describe upgrade and not recovery, and because the inputs must be physically ordered (c > f > t) or the balance returns nonsense. It also matters to know what the balance assumes — representative, reconciled samples of the same metal in the same units — because garbage assays give garbage metrics no matter how exact the algebra.

Formula

Mass yield (mass pull) — two-product
Y = (f − t) / (c − t)
Metal recovery — two-product
R = Y × (c / f)
Ratio of concentration
K = 1 / Y = (c − t) / (f − t)
Enrichment ratio
ER = c / f
Three-product concentrate yield
C₁/F = [(f−t)(c₂′−t′) − (f′−t′)(c₂−t)] / [(c₁−t)(c₂′−t′) − (c₁′−t′)(c₂−t)]

Units involved

  • f, c, t — feed, concentrate, tailings assays of one metal, same units (% or g/t)
  • Y — mass yield / mass pull, a fraction (×100 for %)
  • R — metal recovery, a fraction (×100 for %)
  • K — ratio of concentration, tonnes of feed per tonne of concentrate
  • ER — enrichment ratio, dimensionless (c/f)
  • f′, c₁′, c₂′, t′ — assays of a second metal across the four streams (three-product)

Concept diagram

Metallurgical recovery formulas — accounting for measured grades, not predictingfeed fmeasuredconcentrate ctailings trecovery, yield, ratio, enrichment from f, c, taccounting from measured assays — not prediction

Worked example

A copper circuit assays feed 1.0% Cu, concentrate 10.0% Cu, tailings 0.2% Cu. Compute the four accounting metrics.

  1. 01Mass yield: Y = (1.0 − 0.2)/(10.0 − 0.2) = 0.8/9.8 = 0.08163 = 8.163%
  2. 02Recovery: R = 0.08163 × (10.0/1.0) = 0.8163 = 81.63%
  3. 03Ratio of concentration: K = 1/0.08163 = 12.25 (t feed per t concentrate)
  4. 04Enrichment ratio: ER = 10.0/1.0 = 10.0
  5. 05Read these as the accounting for the sampled period — not a prediction of future recovery
Result

Recovery 81.63%, yield 8.163%, ratio of concentration 12.25, enrichment ratio 10.0 — exact mass-balance accounting of the measured assays.

Common mistakes

  • Treating computed recovery as a prediction or guarantee of future plant performance.
  • Confusing mass yield (mass pull) with recovery — they are different fractions.
  • Mixing assay units or metals between the feed, concentrate, and tailings streams.
  • Using inputs that violate c > f > t and getting negative or >100% results.
  • Reading a high ratio of concentration or enrichment ratio as high recovery — they describe upgrade, not recovery.
  • Using non-representative or un-reconciled samples and trusting the metrics anyway.

When to use the calculator

Use the two-product formula calculator for a single-concentrate circuit to get recovery, yield, ratio of concentration, and enrichment ratio together. Use the ratio of concentration calculator when you specifically want the tonnes-of-feed-per-tonne-of-concentrate ratio. Use the three-product formula calculator when the circuit makes two concentrates plus a tailings and you have two metals assayed across all four streams. All three reconcile measured assays — for the recovery a circuit will actually achieve, use metallurgical testwork and qualified review.

FAQ

Do metallurgical recovery formulas predict recovery?
No. They account for recovery from assays you have already measured. They reconcile the feed, concentrate, and tailings grades into recovery, yield, and ratio of concentration for the sampled period. They do not forecast future recovery, model flotation or leaching, or guarantee performance — that needs testwork and is out of scope.
What is the difference between recovery, yield, ratio of concentration, and enrichment ratio?
Recovery is the fraction of metal reporting to concentrate. Mass yield (mass pull) is the fraction of mass reporting to concentrate. Ratio of concentration is the tonnes of feed per tonne of concentrate (1/yield). Enrichment ratio is the concentrate grade divided by the feed grade. Recovery is about metal, yield and ratio about mass, enrichment about grade.
When do I need the three-product formula instead of the two-product formula?
When the circuit produces two concentrates plus a tailings (for example a Pb concentrate and a Zn concentrate). The two-product formula handles one concentrate and one tailing. The three-product case needs two metals assayed across all four streams to close the balance.
Why must the feed grade lie between the concentrate and tailings grades?
Because conservation of mass requires it: the feed is a blend of the concentrate and tailings, so its grade must sit between them (c > f > t). If the assays violate this, the samples are not representative or not reconciled, and the formulas return physically meaningless numbers.
Are these formulas a substitute for metallurgical accounting software?
No. They are the foundational accounting relationships, useful for checking and understanding a balance. Full metallurgical accounting — multi-stream reconciliation, best-fit data reconciliation, period balances across a whole plant — is a larger discipline that these single-balance formulas support but do not replace.

Related calculators

Related conversions

Related guides